Email this page to a friend!

Notice (8): Undefined index:  url [APP/views/blogs/index.ctp, line 43]

Australian budget: the verdict on aid

 

Our Aid Uncut campaign set the Government 3 tests for this year’s federal budget. How have they fared?

1: Keep Australia on track to spend 0.5% of national income on foreign aid by 2016-17.
Wayne Swan’s budget did increase the overall aid budget on paper, increasing aid from 0.35% of national income to 0.37%. This is actually the amount of aid needed to reach in 2013-14 if the Government was to stay on track to reach 0.5% by 2016-17. But the increase was coupled with a decision to postpone (for the second time in 2 years) the deadline by a further year: the new target date is 2017-18.

This second broken promise means that while the aid budget will still increase, it will increase far more slowly than the Government promised when it made its original commitment in 2007 which was re-iterated in 2010.


2: Finish the job on polio eradication.
No announcement was made in the budget but there is every reason to believe that new money for polio will be announced soon.


3: Ensure aid money is spent to help end poverty overseas.
In December 2012 the Government announced that it was ‘reprioritising’ $375 million of the aid budget – moving money from overseas anti-poverty programs to pay for onshore asylum seeker costs. This has been repeated for the 2013-14 budget and looks set to become a regular feature of the Government’s aid spend.

The Government argues that this is allowed under OECD rules governing what counts as aid. Whilst this may be true (the rules are somewhat flexible) onshore asylum costs are NOT covered by the Australian Government’s own definition of aid which it set out just one year ago and which is supposed to apply until 2015-16.

This may sound like a technical issue but changing the definition of Australian aid means that more aid money is being spent here in Australia and less aid is helping to end global poverty.

Taking the postponement of the 0.5% target by a further year ($1.9 billion) and the new refugee spending (capped at $1 billion) together means that over the next 4 years there will be $2.9 billion less real aid for overseas anti-poverty programmes compared to what was promised last year.

So people living in extreme poverty have paid the price for the collapse in Australian Government revenue that preceded this budget. That is not an outcome in which anyone should take pride.

Posted by Tom Sharman Australian Campaigns Manager in Aid, Poverty for column Aid Uncut on May 15th, 21:20

Reflecting on our success

 

 

 

We all want to see the end of extreme poverty. But how do you tackle it? As our colleague (and resident nomad!) d’Arcy likes to say, you can tackle this massive issue the same way you eat an elephant: one bite at a time.

We’re thrilled to share the news that we’re one bite closer to ending extreme poverty! Last week the global community came together and pledged US$4 billion to completely wipe out polio – a disease that affects some of our world’s most vulnerable children, pulling them and their families deeper into poverty.

Our Global Campaign Manager, Michael, was lucky enough to attend the Global Vaccine Summit in Abu Dhabi last week, and watched in astonishment as governments including Canada and the UK joined Bill Gates and other philanthropists in making substantial funding commitments for a new plan to wipe out all polio, everywhere, by 2018. While that’s exciting news in its own right, what made it even more special was the knowledge that our supporters  (i.e. you)  had played an incredibly important role in securing these commitments – particularly from the Canadian and British governments.

 

How we did it

At the Global Poverty Project, we know that, in democratic societies at least, governments represent their constituents and act according to their wishes. As Bono says, “we can’t blame the politicians because we have to give them permission to spend what is in the end our money.” So we work to increase the number and effectiveness of ordinary citizens taking action to influence key decision-makers to do more to end extreme poverty and diseases like polio.

So when we heard that the global partnership working to end polio had come up with a new plan to eradicate this disease within the next six years, we knew that we needed to mobilise large numbers of people in some of the world’s wealthiest countries – namely, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States – to convince their governments to help fund this new plan.

To do this, we took a four-pronged approach: media, events, public action and direct advocacy.

 

Media

What better way to reach large numbers of people, including regular citizens and politicians, than to get the extraordinary story of polio eradication out in the media? We wrote op-eds, hosted newsworthy events (see below) and built relationships with key journalists, leading to more than 100 media clippings including coverage by the BBC, the Islam Channel, Embassy Magazine, the Independent on Sunday, the Sydney Morning Herald, Radio NZ National and the Diplomatic Courier. We worked in close collaboration with other organisations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the UN Foundation and Rotary International to ensure a steady stream of “surround sound” around this issue, encouraging more people to join the campaign and encouraging governments to take this issue seriously.

 

Events

 

Events kill many birds with one stone. They are an ideal platform for interacting with decision-makers and loyal supporters, while giving you a chance to secure media and public interest.

We hosted a variety of events across all of our target countries with at least one being held in each parliament/Congress, from the United States to New Zealand, with key leaders invited to attend. We engaged the Pakistani diaspora in Canada, mobilised grassroots support in the British Secretary of State for International Development’s electorate, and were able to secure, for the first time, a public statement of bipartisan support in Australia.

 

Public action

First we asked folks to sign the petition either on our website or through Global Citizen - and 40,000 people in 150 countries did!

This gave us a clear measure to demonstrate the breadth of public support for polio eradication; but we knew we also needed to show the depth. So we asked those who had signed the petition to take further actions, either to get their friends, family and followers to join the campaign or to demonstrate to world leaders the level of their support.

The response was incredible. Our supporters tweeted, posted on Facebook, wrote emails, penned letters, made phone calls and even met with their elected representatives to personally encourage them to take up the case. Together we helped build a global movement in support of eradicating this cruel virus.

 

Direct advocacy

We had a lot of meetings with government decision-makers. And almost every time we went, we took along the petition to demonstrate that there were 40,000 people behind us. Michael and Akram Azimi, the Young Australian of the Year and ambassador for this campaign, met with more than 25 members of parliament, including the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader, in Australia alone.

We asked the government officials we met with to show their support for the campaign in concrete and tangible ways. Whether they were diplomats, bureaucrats, cabinet ministers or legislators, we asked them to express their support through tweeting, speaking in parliamentary debates, writing to their party leader and, ultimately, supporting an increase in funding from their respective governments.

 

 

What next?

Last week saw a historic moment – with more than 70% of the funding needed to end polio funded, up front, by the global community. But there’s still US$1.5 billion needed to completely wipe out this disease. We know that, without 100% in funding being fully committed, we are placing this unique opportunity at risk.

Funding shortfalls have plagued polio eradication efforts for too long, causing children to miss out on the vital protection of the polio vaccine and creating the ideal conditions for mass outbreaks. We have a narrow window of opportunity to wipe out this disease, right now, otherwise it will return with a vengeance, and paralyse more than 200,000 children a year.

At last week’s Global Vaccine Summit, Bill Gates was asked where he hoped the remaining funds would come from. He responded by singling out three countries in particular: Australia, Japan and the United States.

We don’t as yet have a presence in Japan, but we are determined to convince the Australian and American governments to pay for their fair share. So we need to keep up the momentum and continue to press the case in coming months. We mustn’t give up when we’re so close! In fact, if you have five minutes, why not show your continued support right now by taking the time to contact key decision-makers in the US and Australia.

 

Australia: Tweet @BobJCarr @JuliaGillard @AusAID

United States: Send Senator Harkin an email

 

Learn more about how the campaign succeeded in Canada and the UK and sign our petition here to convince others to fund the plan to end polio.

Why aid matters now

 

You might have already heard about the good news on global poverty this week. If you haven’t – the number of people living in poverty has fallen by about 200 million in 5 years.

This didn’t happen by magic. But nor is there a single explanation for it. To borrow from The Global Poverty Project language archive – there are 200 million reasons.

One of these is foreign aid. Aid is not perfect - no government spending or private investment ever is. But good aid, spent well, has made a difference.

Polio is one example. Without vaccination programs paid for by foreign aid, including money provided by the Australian Government, we would not be close to eradicating only the second disease in human history. 25 years ago there were 350,000 cases of polio; last year there were just 223.

Yet more than this, foreign aid is the canary in the coal mine of international development efforts.

Rich countries that have turned their back on foreign aid, allowing their contributions to wither, have not embraced the big structural issues that will help end poverty.

You do not see the likes of Italy making the case for pro-poor trade deals, tax justice, or action to combat climate change.

But you do see long-time aid champions like Norway making the case for anti-poverty action on a range of issues.

So the choice for Australia and Australians is clear: do we want to champion aid as part of our efforts to help end extreme poverty? Or will it be death by a thousand cuts as we abandon the people who need our help the most?

Posted by Tom Sharman, Australian Campaigns Manager in Aid, What Can I Do?, Poverty for column Aid Uncut on Apr 30th, 17:16

New Canaan Country School Lives Below the Line

 

Kristen Ball and Stefan Borowski's 5th grade classroom at New Canaan Country School in Connecticut have worked together to develop menus for the Live Below the Line challenge.  

Kristen Ball and Stefan Borowski taught their students about issues of extreme poverty and explained what the Live Below the Line challenge is about.  Kristen and Stefan's students were surprised to learn that 1.2 billion people around the world are currently living in extreme poverty.  

Kirsten Ball will participate in the Live Below the Line challenge this year and will live on less than $1.50 a day for 5 days to help raise awarness about extreme poverty.  

Students used the worksheet pictured above to research foods that were nutritious and would fit within the budget of $1.50 a day.  The worksheet gave students practice researching, adding, subtracting, multiplying with deciminals and looking at quantities over time.  

As they prepared their teacher for the challenge, the students realized how little they could purchase for $1.50 a day.  They became more aware of everyday spending and realized that, thought living Below the Line will be challenging, it does not compare to the issues faced by people living in extreme poverty every day.  

Posted by Kristen Ball in Poverty for column Live Below the Line on Apr 30th, 07:21

The UK calls time on polio

 

Pledges £300m over the next six years at Vaccine Summit in Abu Dhabi

For decades, polio ruined the lives of countless children and ended countless more. For decades, millions of people lived under the threat of polio; regardless of whether they lived in countries rich or poor. Today, through firm resolve and dedication, the threat of polio has receded from our shores. Thanks to an effective vaccine, a system of delivery and the political will to bring those two together, polio was wiped out. This is the story of polio in the United Kingdom, but it is not the story of polio everywhere. Until now.

Polio hasn't been endemic in the UK for over 40 years, but it remained at-large in poor countries for decades. However, in the past 30 years, global cases of polio have sunk from over 350,000 in 1988 to just 223 last year. That's a 99% decrease. The fight to defeat polio has arguably been the single greatest triumph of global public health in the past century. For the first time this century, we stand on the edge of eliminating a human disease. Whether in the world's wealthiest or poorest nations, the day when all humanity will be free of the threat of polio is finally within sight.

The United Kingdom has been central to that fight. In fact, proportionate to GNI, the UK is the single greatest government donor of polio vaccinations in history. Successive British governments have worked to eradicate the disease that destroyed the lives of so many of their people. For 30 years, the UK has been at the forefront of world governments who realised that as long as a single case of polio existed beyond our borders, all the world's children were at risk. That fight is almost won. Just three countries still have ongoing struggles with the disease.

Today, the Department for International Development announced that they were putting the final nail in polio's coffin, with an incredible donation of £300m over the next six years. This money will go on to vaccinate up to 360m children around the world. Not only that, but this new lease of a life free from polio will allow those children to grow, and has afforded them the best chance they could possibly have of a life beyond polio and, ultimately, beyond poverty.

Justine Greening, Secretary of State for International Development said: "Britain will not stand on the sidelines while easily-preventable diseases like polio are still a risk to thousands of people around the world. Our generation has a genuine opportunity to make the devastating disease of polio a thing of the past, just as has happened with smallpox. We now call on all other donors to join us because the healthier a population, the better able it is to contribute to and benefit from economic development."

With the generosity of this commitment and the steadfastness of their support, the British Government have taken that final step towards a polio-free world; a world which we could now see as early as 2018. This commitment means that in our lifetime, we will see the end of polio. Moreover, it means that hundreds of millions of children will now live to see it in their lifetimes, too. That is what the UK has just set out. Thanks to that commitment, we now know how this story will end, and when.

Posted by Ciaran Norris in Polio for column GPP - United Kingdom on Apr 25th, 09:00